Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Man Receives Oral Sex; Ordered to Pay Child Support?!


I'm a bit late on providing my take on this legal issue. Nonetheless, there are moral issues that can never be quantified in timeliness. 

Based on the article it appears that the plaintiff in the civil suit against his ex-girlfriend had repeatedly expressed his desire not to have children until after they were married. The plaintiff had no problem with protected sexual intercourse nor did he have issue with oral sex, until he was ordered to pay child support. 

My first thought was that the plaintiff had a misplaced religious conviction that was the basis for his desire to not have children until after marriage. However, protected sex and oral sex is still consider sex and the sexual union between a man and a woman had already been established. However, my second and probably more accurate thought was that the plaintiff really had no desire to have a child with this woman and or didn't want the financial burden that is associated with raising a child.

Nonetheless, you can't have your cake and eat it too. There are always consequences for your actions. In our society today, sex is just another form of personal entertainment therefore we fail to realize the emotional and physical bond that we establish with each sex partner. Sexual intercourse is a bond that God meant to strengthen a marriage between a man & a women and for the obvious purposes of pro creation. I often told an ex-acquaintance that "You can't play with the Devil and expect not to get forked"! Meaning, if you are living in sin and in this case having premarital sex, you cannot expect that there will be no ramifications. 

However, what is more intriguing is the continued assault on men's rights. In California as in most states across America, men have little to no input on the life of their children. In this case a man had no desire to have a child yet his semen was artificially inseminated and a child was conceived without his knowledge. While I am sure the judge that ordered the child support weighed all of the credible evidence before making his or her determination, it is cases such as this that make the fight for men's rights a greater uphill battle. Nonetheless, despite the means the ex-girlfriend used to become pregnant, every child should have the financial support of both biological parents and or surrogate parents. 

I will continue to watch this case to see how it unfolds and determine what impact if any it will have on the rest of the country.

What do you think? 
  1. Was this an expensive lesson to learn?
  2. Do you think that sex is just a personal form of entertainment or do you believe that sexual intercourse has a much more significant role within a marriage?
  3. Men: Will you think twice before your next BJ with someone other than your wife
  4. Women: What do you think of the ex-girlfriends means to become pregnant?
  5. Did he get what he deserved?
I would love to hear your opinions...


If you have any questions, feel free to contact us at http://www.Corinthian-Group.com . All cases our strictly confidential as is our means of communication.